Latest from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta & more
283 stories
A new study from Washington State University found that ChatGPT failed to accurately answer basic true-or-false scientific questions at rates far below what would be expected from a human with a high school education, raising fresh questions about the reliability of the technology that companies and schools are rapidly deploying. Researchers discovered the AI confidently provided wrong answers as often as correct ones on fundamental concepts ranging from physics to biology, a finding that challenges the widespread assumption that large language models have mastered domains beyond creative writing. The results suggest that despite its impressive conversational abilities, ChatGPT remains fundamentally limited as a source of factual information—a gap that could have serious consequences as institutions rush to integrate AI into education and scientific research.
2 sources
OpenAI draws a line between AI “smut” and porn. Experts fear it’s all unhealthy.
On Friday, Encyclopedia Britannica and dictionary publisher Merriam-Webster filed a lawsuit against OpenAI alleging that it used their copyrighted content to train its AI, then generated responses...
Learn how to use Spotify, Canva, Figma, Expedia, and other apps directly in ChatGPT.
So when exactly is smut considered porn? | Cath Virginia / The Verge | Photos from Getty Images OpenAI's delayed "adult mode" for ChatGPT is expected to support saucy text conversations at launch,...
How ChatGPT defends against prompt injection and social engineering by constraining risky actions and protecting sensitive data in agent workflows.